The latest Medical News has two independent
surveys by the Chapman University, expressing concern at the mislabeling of
meat products. Separately, we are witnessing increasing number of mislabeling
or deceptive labeling of skin care and cosmetic products.
The two surveys highlight that the
mislabeling is most common in products purchased from online suppliers. In the case of beauty products, the
mislabeling, or deceptive claims, is more unethical especially while promising
unbelievable results.
Past few months have seen rising number
of complaints, especially for beauty products, received by agencies such as
Advertising Standards Agency and the Better Business Bureau.
A recent opinion poll, based on a
sample of cosmetics advertisements in Vogue, Glamour, Marie Claire, Harper’s
Bazaar, Elle, InStyle and People StyleWatch, revealed that a mere 17% of
respondents trusted the advertising industry, 39% were cynical toward
advertising, 7% were deceptiveness-wary (they acknowledge advertising is
somehow beneficial without trusting it) and 16% regarded advertising as deceptively
harmful. Out of a sample of 621 ad claims, only 136 were found to follow fair
marketing campaigns.
One usually finds no substantiation
of the claims made in most of the beauty products, and those who back the
claims with “scientific evidence” and “consumer testing”, often use
questionable methodologies for their substantiation. Some examples of cosmeceuticals include
anti-aging or anti-wrinkle products, fat-reducing creams and facial scrubs for
smoother, firmer, more evenly pigmented skin. Many products, questionably, claim
to “eliminate” wrinkles, lines and spots.
We at Herbally Radiant have been
highlighting such unethical marketing claims, more so in the case of web-based
suppliers. In all labels and packaging of Herbally Radiant products, consumers
are clearly explained the ingredients and specific benefits of products. This helps
consumers to make well informed choice.
For scientific claims, the concrete
evidence of ingredients, the scientific research processes used and lab results
should be provided in laymen's terminology so as to help consumers understand
such claims in the right context.
There are also grave concerns about
environmental issues. It would be desirable to indicate clearly whatever
environmental attributes might be germane to the product – for example, if the
product was not pretested on animals prior to being distributed to consumers.
Additionally, research has also
showed that luxury perception may differ depending on the visual art employed.
Some of these visual arts are similar to the concept of “radical fashion” (i.e.
that unlikely to be adapted in reality). Consumers need to understand the
purpose of the images presented and the claims made in cosmetics advertisements.
No comments:
Post a Comment